gordanbobich.net
Date: Thu Nov 01 2007 - 09:24:43 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Jorey Bump wrote:

> gordanbobich.net wrote, at 11/01/2007 09:56 AM:
>
>> The MTA should try the MX-es in the correct order, regardless of whether
>> the Additional section contains the high priority MX information or not.
>> If that takes a second look-up specifically for the high priority MX, so
>> be it.
>
> You might want to explain what you're trying to accomplish with your multiple
> MX records. This list is ridiculously long, and the TTLs are far to high for
> an experiment. It's hard to look at the results of this query and jump to the
> conclusion that Postfix is at fault:

You're jumping to conclusions.

1) That's not the domain that's having problems.
2) It's MX-es are not running postfix (they are running courier)
3) The MX-es are there for a reason. Google "nolisting".
4) Lots of MX-es are no excuse whatsoever for not re-trying them in the
correct order, whether their IPs get reported back in the additional
section or not.

Gordan

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]