OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
Re: New document: STRESS_README

From: Andreas Grimm (grimm.andreasyahoo.com)
Date: Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:37:25 CDT

Hello, you're right. max_connections makes sense only to unix-stream. As pointed out earlier log_fifo_size does the trick on my server. Sorry for the hopwash i wrote. Increasing log_fifo_size in the options solves it. I read the TUNING_README too, and think that would help others if this will be mentioned somewhere. ----- Original Message ---- From: Victor Duchovni <Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com> To: Andreas Grimm <grimm.andreasyahoo.com> Cc: postfix-userspostfix.org Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2007 5:23:15 PM Subject: Re: New document: STRESS_README On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 09:02:34AM -0700, Andreas Grimm wrote: > Hello Victor, > > i was using unix-dgram. The problem was the default value of max-connections per dgram. The default is 10. I increased it: > unix-dgram("/dev/log" max_connections(1000)); > unix-dgram("/var/lib/named/dev/log" max_connections(1000)); The point about "dgram" is that it is connection-less, so I find this puzzling. I don't need such a setting and have hundreds of processes using syslog-ng. > A notice about the syslog-ng should be added to the STRESS_README. I > can't tell about the behaviour of the standard syslogd, but that is the > solution for syslog-ng. Finally. It is not stress specific, just high concurrency specific. Also the sock-stream /dev/log is a Linux (platform-specific) topic and is also syslog-daemon dependent. Perhaps TUNING_README is better, but it is not clear to me what the best place to mention this may be. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com