|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
MorganStanley.com)
Date: Thu Nov 01 2007 - 13:04:45 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:52:03PM +0000, gordan
bobich.net wrote:
> Thank you all for helping me troubleshoot this. On a separate note,
> Postfix doesn't try just the top 5 MX-es as was implied in an earlier
> post. It tries all of them at least up to 17. ;-)
There is not just one Postfix, the one speak of has earlier incarnations,
that real-world users still use on real systems. And yet *the* Postfix
is 2.4.6 or 2.5-20071006 depending on context.
> As to why it kept re-trying the 17th 6 times in 5 hours rather than trying
> again from the top is a separate question, but I guess that squeezes past
> the RFC under the "retry in due time" part. ;-)
Once again flawed observations, lets just drop it here. The subsequent
retries also tried the same MX hosts, but there is no need to continue
the thread just to establish this point.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]