From: Ali Nebi (anebiiguanait.com)
Date: Mon Nov 05 2007 - 02:54:42 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Ignore Justin's advice. There is nothing wrong with ending the top-level
> restriction lists with "permit". It is not necessary, but it makes the
> list easier for some to understand. Recipient validation happens implicitly
> after the recipient passes all the other checks, even with "permit" present.
>
> Make sure you don't have unwanted relay_domains, wildcard canonical or
> virtual rules, ...

Hi, thanks for the reply.
I checked these things and everything looks ok, in canonical we have set
all our domains like this: mydomains.com mydomain.com
I think this is ok.
What i saw when i tested permit option, was that when it is set (example
for senders), the system not reject non exist senders, it accept the
messages, when i removed permit it rejected non exist users and passed
exist one. I don't know how this non exist email passed from all other
rules and after then it was accept. About reject_unlisted_recipient i
read in postfix documentation that it is enable by default and we don't
need to listed in our restrictions. This is valid only for postfix
versions > 2.1. We have installed 2.3

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]