|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Keean Schupke (keean
fry-it.com)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2007 - 13:14:35 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Actually, this is no good, as I would need the transport chosen by
relayhost not by eventual destination... as we will be using
"sender_dependent_relayhost_maps" to decide which relay to send things
through...
Don't suppose sender_dependent_relayhost_maps could be made to work
like transport maps? so that the RHS is "transport:next_hop"? This
would allow me to choose different transport options (vai the
master.cf) for different senders.
Cheers,
Keean Schupke, Fry-IT Ltd.
On 21/11/2007, Keean Schupke <keean
fry-it.com> wrote:
> Okay, so I create a new entry in master.cf with a -o option set and a new name.
>
> Cheers,
> Keean Schupke, Fry-IT Ltd.
>
>
> On 21/11/2007, Victor Duchovni <Victor.Duchovni
morganstanley.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 06:44:55PM +0000, Keean Schupke wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > > > Good point about serialising the authentication requests... I have set
> > > > > > "default_destination_concurrency_limit" to one in my configuration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there only one destination from this system? Otherwise I would
> > > > > recommend a transport-specific setting, with just the broken destination
> > > > > routed to the serialized transport.
> > >
> > > Actually seems neater to just limit the concurrency of the smtp
> > > transport... no point in restricting things if unnecessarily.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to configure a per-transport setting based on the
> > > transport table then? for example:
> > >
> > >
abc.com smtp:[broken-relay.com] concurrency(1)
> > > * smtp:[okay-relay.com]
> >
> > See the "RESOURCE AND RATE CONTROLS" section of the smtp(8) manpage.
> > The parameter is actually enforced by the queue manager (which is obvious,
> > in the mathematical sense of "obvious", i.e. obvious to an expert).
> >
> > --
> > Viktor.
> >
> > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
> > Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
> > http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
> > <mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
> >
> > If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
> > send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
> > "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
> >
>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]