From: Wietse Venema (wietseporcupine.org)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2007 - 13:30:31 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Keean Schupke:
> Actually, this is no good, as I would need the transport chosen by
> relayhost not by eventual destination... as we will be using
> "sender_dependent_relayhost_maps" to decide which relay to send things
> through...
>
> Don't suppose sender_dependent_relayhost_maps could be made to work
> like transport maps? so that the RHS is "transport:next_hop"? This
> would allow me to choose different transport options (vai the
> master.cf) for different senders.

Actually, that would be sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps. It
has not yet been implemented due to lack of demand.

        Wietse

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]