From: Keean Schupke (keeanfry-it.com)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2007 - 13:35:40 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Well, they don't handle anything else... I am planning to divert
bounce messages via another relay, or they just dont get through, and
was thinking no point in restricting this to concurrency 1... but its
not a big deal.

Sounds like you might be getting the idea about the organisation though...

Regards,
Keean Schupke, Fry-IT Ltd.

On 21/11/2007, Victor Duchovni <Victor.Duchovnimorganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:14:35PM +0000, Keean Schupke wrote:
>
> > Actually, this is no good, as I would need the transport chosen by
> > relayhost not by eventual destination... as we will be using
> > "sender_dependent_relayhost_maps" to decide which relay to send things
> > through...
> >
> > Don't suppose sender_dependent_relayhost_maps could be made to work
> > like transport maps? so that the RHS is "transport:next_hop"? This
> > would allow me to choose different transport options (vai the
> > master.cf) for different senders.
>
> It replaces just the nexthop, not the transport. A single transport should
> suffice for all the evil nexthops. The nexthop could be another Postfix
> instance on the same machine, where the real connection is made to the
> remote machines, the passwords are handled, ... and the smtp concurrency
> limit is 1.
>
> It sounds like the hosts handle more than just mail to battleship
> titanic bureaucracy. The same host also sends mail on behalf of
> other organizations. It may be best to add another instance to
> confine the damage from the work-around (queue congestion, ...)
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
> Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
> Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
>
> To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
> <mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
>
> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
> send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
> "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]