From: Keean Schupke (keeanfry-it.com)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2007 - 13:36:52 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Well the damand here is low... its a "would be nice" not an absolutely
necessary.

Regards,
Keean Schupke, Fry-IT Ltd.

On 21/11/2007, Wietse Venema <wietseporcupine.org> wrote:
> Keean Schupke:
> > Actually, this is no good, as I would need the transport chosen by
> > relayhost not by eventual destination... as we will be using
> > "sender_dependent_relayhost_maps" to decide which relay to send things
> > through...
> >
> > Don't suppose sender_dependent_relayhost_maps could be made to work
> > like transport maps? so that the RHS is "transport:next_hop"? This
> > would allow me to choose different transport options (vai the
> > master.cf) for different senders.
>
> Actually, that would be sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps. It
> has not yet been implemented due to lack of demand.
>
> Wietse
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]