From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com)
Date: Sun Dec 02 2007 - 19:27:19 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 08:23:16PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:

> > But this does not solve the multi-writer problem, so we largely get the
> > same behaviour without the "proxy:".
>
> So he specifies a non-default proxymap service with
> process limit=1.

And a new map type other than "proxy:" that talks to this service rather
than proxymap? Cloning the "proxy:" map type is a bunch of work, where's
the win (we lose memory-only caching)?

--
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]