Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email email@example.com
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com)
Date: Mon Dec 10 2007 - 14:29:42 CST
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:06:31PM -0500, Greg Cowie wrote:
> Thanks very much Victor - by dividing the incoming and outgoing into two
> transport streams and applying the smtp_generic_maps to JUST the
> outgoing stream, I get around the issue of not wanting to rewrite
> recipient fields, as those by definition will be in the incoming stream.
In headers there is no real difference between recipients and senders,
as "Reply" reverses the roles. The important mental rule is that any
single email reader should see a consistent and stable view of the
addresses in headers, and be able to use the addresses to reply.
So destination-dependent rewriting makes more sense than context-dependent
(context == From, To or Cc) rewriting.
If you can separate inside and outside recipients by transport you are
doing as well as-is reasonably possible.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.