|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
MorganStanley.com)
Date: Fri Jan 25 2008 - 10:21:56 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 01:15:54AM +0900, YOSHIMURA Keitaro wrote:
> > > I was found a bug.
> > > "post-install" has forgotten to read data_directory value.
> > >
> > > The value of data_directory fails in chown because of emptiness in
> > > starting the change of post-install of the owner of data_directory.
> > > Then, processing of post-install stops because of that.
> >
> > How are using "post-install". It is not supposed to be invoked directly.
>
> There might not be difference in the thing that there is a leakage in
> the processing when reading from main.cf. Should not this processing be
> done, and should not I shed it as an error if it should not call it
> directly?
I don't understand what you are saying.
Thanks for the bug report, there is indeed a minor inconsistency in how
data_directory is handled, but it should be harmless. What problem did
you run into and how?
Did you run "post-install" directly? Don't, you should be using "postfix"
instead.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]