|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
MorganStanley.com)
Date: Fri Feb 01 2008 - 08:46:49 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
>
>
> >> I have foud something of similar. But I'm not fully persuased because I
> >> get the message above is destined to two ore more recipients.
> >
> > The SMTP RFC requires that a server can accept 100 recipients.
> >
> > /etc/postfix/master.cf:
> > borked unix - - n - - smtp
> >
> > /etc/postfix/transport:
> > example.com borked:
> >
> > Execute "postmap /etc/postfix/transport".
> >
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
> > borked_destination_recipient_limit = 1
> >
> > Execute "postfix reload".
>
> I don't think that is the cause of my problem. Infact I have checked that
> al the message destined to just one recipient could give the temporary
> error.
Which temporary error? Once the queue is throttled by messages with
too many recipients, yes single-recipient messages will also be
deferred. Don't just read the logs, understand them!
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]