From: MacShane, Tracy (Tracy.MacshaneAirservicesAustralia.com)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2008 - 18:23:05 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-postfix-userspostfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-userspostfix.org] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus
> Sent: Monday, 4 February 2008 10:04 PM
> To: postfix-userspostfix.org
> Subject: Re: FW: example exchange subject vacation for header_checks
>
> On 2/3/2008, MacShane, Tracy (Tracy.MacshaneAirservicesAustralia.com)
> wrote:
> > Of course, it helps if the Exchange user configures the OOO reply to
> > *not* reply to messages tagged with whatever their spam tag is
> > (trivial to do in Outlook).
>
> Vacation message handling should happen at the MTA level, NOT
> the MUA level.
>
> Anything else is horribly broken.
>

It's not the MUA that is handling the vacation ruleset. It's merely an
interface to the ruleset that is created on the Exchange (MTA) server. I
don't guarantee that it's not "broken" in some way, but it's certainly
not broken in the way you suggest.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]