|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: James M (jlmjlist
gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2008 - 14:01:58 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks Viktor-
I'm not sure how to whitelist recipients before applying restrictions.
Would you explain or point me in the right direction?
-James
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Victor Duchovni
<Victor.Duchovni
morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 12:42:56PM -0500, James M wrote:
>
> > I'm still relatively new to postfix so I'm asking the experts for input.
> > I would like to implement stricter filtering but I have to be careful
> > with one address such that it is always accepted.
> > Here's my specific issue.
> > I need to accept mail addressed (envelope or headers)
>
> If you drop the unnatural "headers" condition (as mail not actually
> arriving for "juser" is for "juser", and the headers are simply
> irrelevant). Then you can easily white-list the envelope recipient
> before applying further restrictions. Otherwise you are out of luck.
>
>
> > I also want to use reject_non_fqdn_hostname in
> > smptd_helo_restrictions. It seems impossible to satisfy both needs.
> > Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_reject
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
> Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
> Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
>
> To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
> <mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
>
> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
> send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
> "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]