|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: René Nussbaumer (postfix
protection-fault.ch)
Date: Sat Apr 26 2008 - 02:55:40 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:19:22PM +0000, D Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 at 18:53 -0400, wietse
porcupine.org confabulated:
>
>> Ren? Nussbaumer:
>> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:21:13PM +0000, D Hill wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 at 00:03 +0200, postfix
protection-fault.ch
>>>> confabulated:
>>> Yes, I'm aware of this fact. However, a backup MX should take care of
>>> the mail if the primary is currently not reachable.
>> Then the backup MX host MUST have a valid recipient list.
> If the backup MX had a valid recipent list, used
> smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender, and relay_recipient_maps, would the patch
> even be needed?
No, but then you loss the advantage of having recipient verification as
you need to maintain the recipient list on the servers anyway.
René
--
http://killerfox.protection-fault.ch/
http://forkbomb.ch/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]