|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
morganstanley.com)
Date: Fri May 02 2008 - 09:03:44 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:48:58AM -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi! Any recommendations for RBLs, apart from zen.spamhaus.org (the ONLY one
> I use)?
After filtering with Zen, there is not much additional value you get from
more IP RBLs (without signficant FP risk). For example, list.dsbl.org is
quite safe, but only adds ~1-2% after Zen.
Some people report good results with bl.spamcop.net, which reputedly has
become safer to use for rejects (not just scoring), but it not really
intended for this use last I checked.
Beyond Zen, your efforts are probably best directed at message content
filtering say SpamAssassin with SURBL lookups to filter spam URLs, ...
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]