From: Joe Laffey (joelaffeycomputer.com)
Date: Fri May 02 2008 - 12:16:42 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 2 May 2008, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:

> Joe Laffey <joelaffeycomputer.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2 May 2008, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>>
>>> Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandtcharite.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> * Matthias Schmidt <betaadmilon.net>:
>>>>> Am/On Fri, 2 May 2008 10:48:58 -0300 schrieb/wrote Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi! Any recommendations for RBLs, apart from zen.spamhaus.org
>>>>>
>>>>> besides zen.spamhaus.org I use these ones:
>>>>>
>>>>> cbl.abuseat.org
>>>>
>>>> Included in zen :)
>>>
>>> * spamhaus.org limits number of allowed DNS queries
>>> * cbl.abuseat.org generates most "non DUL" hits in zen.spamhaus.org
>>
>>
>> So do you list cbl.abuseat.org first in the checks assuming that any
>> query that matches will save you a hit on spamhaus? Or how do you set
>> that up to reduce the traffic to spamhaus?
>
> You may use the combination below to reduce number of
> spamhaus.org queries:
> a) some list with DUL [e.g. sorbs]
> b) cbl.abuseat.org
> c) zen.spamhaus.org

Correct me if I am wrong, but any mail that is not rejected by the first
two would still query spamhaus, right?

Just want to be sure I undertsand what you mean.

--
Joe Laffey | Visual Effects for Film and Video
LAFFEY Computer Imaging | -------------------------------------
St. Louis, MO | Show Reel http://LAFFEY.tv/?e10344
USA | -------------------------------------
. | -*- Digital Fusion Plugins -*-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]