From: Leon Weber (leonleonweber.de)
Date: Sat May 17 2008 - 13:18:39 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 17.05.2008 14:05:22, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Doesn't mutt notice new mail reasonably soon after it arrives?

Yes it does, but it doesn't notify me, I have to look into the mutt shell every once
in a while. That's not a real problem, but I'd like a notification better.

> If you really want the full messag context, you can bcc your mail to a
> pipe(8) transport that sends the IMs (and ideally rate limits if messages
> arrive too fast). You can use ".forward" if you mailbox is local. In either
> case the command that sends the jabber notices must never return a failure
> code, missed IMs should not prevent mail delivery.

This sounds sane. I'll consider that, thanks.

Leon

--
Leon Weber, leonleonweber.de 0x8E04D7FC
blog: https://leonweber.de/blog
jabber: leonjabber.ccc.de (icq: 261067046)
--
Es nützt der Freiheit nichts, dass wir sie abschaffen, um sie
zu schützen. (Wolfgang Thierse)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkgvIX8ACgkQmxj00I4E1/xxhgCcCHavLBzSmlGdgoQUz8dnV6Ms
ko4AnRF2tVI/5EvqMUZbzZwapb4aFO13
=zBU5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]