|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Chad Whitacre (chad
zetaweb.com)
Date: Wed Oct 01 2008 - 11:55:13 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wietse,
> Sorry, that is backwards.
>
> If you want to "correct" Postfix behavior, then you need to
> provide supporting documentation that Postfix is in error.
>
> So please point out the relevant sections of email related
> RFCs, otherwise I suggest that you refrain from posting
> "corrections".
We've got a misunderstanding. I accept your statement that FQDN
means something different in SMTP than DNS. I'm not trying to
correct Postfix behavior, I'm trying to find the best reference
to add to Wikipedia's article on FQDNs. If I'm not mistaken, 5321
2.3.5 is this reference (and, coincidentally, it appears that
5321 is being published as we speak). Yes?
chad
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]