From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovnimorganstanley.com)
Date: Thu Oct 02 2008 - 11:51:05 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:

> "Delivered to" could be mentioned by the RFC, as well as

No reason to, it has no end-to-end semantics. The only valid consumer
of "Delivered-To" is the system that added it. The header could be:

    X-Loop-COM-EXAMPLE: <date> <hmac-sha1(secret, date+address)>

and would work just as well (or perhaps better) for loop detection.

The point is that RFCs don't need to cover purely local issues.

--
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]