|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: neugi (neugii
gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 15 2008 - 04:19:11 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
permit_sasl_authenticated is already the first entry ;)
right now i looks like this:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_unauth_pipelining,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:60000
best
2008/12/15 <lst_hoe02
kwsoft.de>
> Zitat von neugi <neugii
gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> thx, sasl is already active.
>>
>
> In this case you have the wrong order of restrictions. The
> "permit_sasl_authenticated" must be before any RBL and other spam tests.
> Most of the time it is best to set it on top of all restrictions. This way
> for SASL authenticated user no checks are done at all.
>
> Regards
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]