Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovnimorganstanley.com)
Date: Wed Mar 11 2009 - 02:26:32 CDT
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:41:54PM +0800, saguto yin wrote:
> hi, folks
> this is a simple patch to make postfix 2.5.6 send queueid by xforward
> command to next-hop, hope this can be ...
> BTW: server side queueid parse does not done in this patch.
Why is this necessary? What's wrong with parsing the "id" element of
the top-most "Received:" header? Ignoring text in RFC822 comments,
and Microsoft's grammare violations (since this will be generated
by Postfix), you have:
Received: [FROM client-helo-name]
[BY server-name>] [WITH protocol] [ID queue-id]
[FOR <address>] ";" RFC-822-Date
Postfix always includes the "ID queue-id" attribute-value pair.
There is a price to pay for each additional XFORWARD keyword, it is far
from clear that the benefit justifies the cost in this case.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.