From: Duncan B. (duncanpresidium.org)
Date: Fri Sep 11 2009 - 08:40:40 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Noel Jones wrote:

>> smtpd_recipient_restricions = reject_unauth_destination,
>> reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
>> permit_mynetworks
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>>
>>
>> It seems to me that the restrictions aren't processed in the order that
>> you specify them on the smtpd_recipient_restrictions line? :)
>
> Your observations are flawed. Postfix does indeed evaluate restrictions in
> the order given.
>
> Perhaps you forgot to run "postfix reload" or perhaps your main.cf has more
> than one smtpd_recipient_restrictions defined.
>
> or perhaps you misspelled "restricions" in main.cf like you did in this
> message.
> Always check your "postconf -n" output to verify that postfix see what you
> expect.

Ahh this is more than possible .. Would 'postfix reload' not complain
about a syntax error? I'm sure I've seen this in the past. I always
reload postfix after editing main.cf :-)

>> Sorry for replying again, but I think I may have resolved this:
>>
>> Set smtpd_delay_reject = yes
>> set smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender,
>> reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
>> reject_unknown_recipient_domain
>>
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
>>
>> This seems to have the desired effect. This look OK to you guys?
>
> Yes, this is fine also. There are multiple ways to do what you described
> earlier.

Excellent. All would appear to be fine then, and am loving Postfix.

Thanks again for your help, everyone.

~ Duncan

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]