From: URCentral Gmail ()
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 12:35:02 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
<grknightscent-team.com> wrote:

>> Correcting myself; there are two hash databases specified on the live
>> server, like this;
>>
>>         check_sender_access
>>                 hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_local
>>                 hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_access
>>
>>
>
> If this was specified in recipient restrictions, it is equivalent to:
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_local
> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_access
>
> This refers to the depreciated syntax of bare map in a restriction class.
>
> Postfix does not allow check_(*)_access to list multiple tables.
> The restriction *must* be repeated each time or an assumption takes
> place based on the past.

Ahh, that makes sense. So given the above example;

    check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_local
    check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/chk_sender_access

would work?

Cya,
Jona

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]