|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
morganstanley.com)
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 15:43:10 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 03:08:31PM +0200, Hagen F??rstenau wrote:
> I'm using dovecot for SASL authentication:
>
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks
> permit_sasl_authenticated
> reject_unauth_destination
> smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
> smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth-client
>
> Now if for whatever reason dovecot is not running, smtpd will also
> refuse to work, complaining "fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms".
> I would much prefer it to fall back to "smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no" in
> that case, so that mail for local recipients can still be received. Is
> this possible?
This would incorrectly reject mail, due to a transient problem
(authentication down). A better solution would be to 4XX fail all auth
attempts.
Frankly, configure SASL just on port 587, and *require* SASL there, in
which case, no point in running the service while SASL is down.
Keep your dovecot server running.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]