Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email email@example.com
From: Stan Hoeppner (stanhardwarefreak.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2010 - 23:11:56 CDT
Michael Orlitzky put forth on 11/4/2010 8:06 PM:
> On 11/04/2010 12:39 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Ned Slider put forth on 11/3/2010 6:33 PM:
>>> My other thought was to simply comment (or document) ranges known to
>>> contain FPs and then the user can make a judgement call whether they
>>> want to comment out that particular regex based on their circumstances.
>>> Not a very elegant solution.
>> I'm starting to wonder, considering your thoughts on FPs, if this might
>> be better implemented, for OPs concerned with potential FPs, via a
>> policy daemon, or integrated into SA somehow and used for scoring
>> instead of outright blocking. I don't have the programmatic skill to
>> implement such a thing.
Any idea where I can get a look that the regexes they use in this rule?