Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email email@example.com
From: Ove Evensen (ojkeoutlook.com)
Date: Sat Jun 01 2013 - 08:42:20 CDT
I would say keep it as normal. 2.9 and then 2.10.
If you can not see the difference between 2.1 and 2.10 you should not use postfix. Period!
Ove Jk. Evensen
-------- Original message --------
From: Linux Addict <linuxaddict7gmail.com>
Date: 01/06/2013 14:02 (GMT+00:00)
To: Len Conrad <LConradGo2France.com>
Subject: Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y?
After 2.9, it should have been 3, not 2.10 ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Len Conrad <LConradGo2France.com> wrote:
> At 07:18 AM 6/1/2013, you wrote:
>> Am 31.05.2013 22:56, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it
>>> is time to change the release numbering scheme.
> don't dumb postfix down. keep the current numbering style.