From: Ove Evensen (ojkeoutlook.com)
Date: Sat Jun 01 2013 - 08:42:20 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I would say keep it as normal.  2.9 and then 2.10.
If you can not see the difference between 2.1 and 2.10 you should not use postfix.  Period! 

Regards
Ove Jk. Evensen

-------- Original message --------
From: Linux Addict <linuxaddict7gmail.com>
Date: 01/06/2013 14:02 (GMT+00:00)
To: Len Conrad <LConradGo2France.com>
Cc: postfix-userscloud9.net
Subject: Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y?
 
After 2.9, it should have been 3, not 2.10 ;)

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Len Conrad <LConradGo2France.com> wrote:

> At 07:18 AM 6/1/2013, you wrote:
>> Am 31.05.2013 22:56, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it
>>> is time to change the release numbering scheme.
>
> don't dumb postfix down.  keep the current numbering style.
>
> Len
>
>
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]