OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: The SANS Institute (CriticalVulnerabilityAnalysis_at_sans.org)
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 07:57:39 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    **********************************************************************
                    SANS Critical Vulnerability Analysis
    November 4, 2002 Vol. 1. No. 15
    **********************************************************************

    This was a very quiet week. Although the SANS Security Alert Consensus
    showed 26 new vulnerabilities, only two are worthy of your review
    for possible immediate action.

    Summary: Every week, the CVA prioritizes and summarizes the most
    important vulnerabilities identified during the past week and provides
    data on actions taken by security and systems managers at fifteen
    very large organizations (the Council) to protect their computers
    and networks from exploits of the reported vulnerabilities.

    See "About the CVA Process and Council" at the end of this note for
    more data on how the report is compiled.

    **********************************************************************

    TABLE OF CONTENTS:

    Widely Deployed Software
    - ----------------------------
    (1) Moderate: phpBB Bulletin Board Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

    Other Software
    - ---------------
    (2) Moderate: Kerberos kadmind Buffer Overflow

    ************************ SPONSORED LINKS *****************************
    Privacy notice: These links redirect to non-SANS web pages.

    (1) Eliminate network vulnerabilities. Retina: #1-Rated Scanner. Now
    with wireless threat detection!
    http://www.sans.org/cgi-bin/sanspromo/CVA01

    (2) Need to patch your computers? Try SysUpdate free - the first
    Anti-Vulnerability application.
    http://www.sans.org/cgi-bin/sanspromo/CVA02
    **********************************************************************

    *******************************
       Widely Deployed Software
    *******************************

    (1) phpBB Bulletin Board Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
    ==================================================================
    Affected Products:
    phpBB CGI Suite version 2.0.0

    Description:
    The admin_ug_auth.php script included in the phpBB CGI suite version
    2.0.0 is used to set user permissions. This script does not properly
    check whether received data has been submitted by an authenticated
    administrator, allowing a malicious user to elevate a normal user
    account to administrative status.

    Risk: Local exploit.
    A regular bulletin board user can gain administrative control over
    the phpBB forum.

    Deployment: Significant.
    PhpBB is reported to be the "world's leading open source flat style
    discussion forum software", and has been downloaded more than 1.2
    million times from SourceForge.

    Ease of Exploitation: Trivial.
    Example exploit code has been posted.

    Status: The affected phpBB version is an older version from April
    2002. Non-vulnerable versions have been available since May.

    References:
    - -----------
    SecurityFocus Bugtraq Posting:
    http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-10/0385.html

    Exploit code:
    http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/6F0120A5PU.html

    SourceForge phpBB homepage (get updated software here):
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpbb/

    Council Site Actions:
    The affected software is not in production or widespread use at any
    of the council sites. They reported that no action was necessary.

    ***************************
         Other Software
    ***************************

    (2) Moderate: Kerberos kadmind Buffer Overflow
        This is an update to last weeks posting.

    Affected Products:
    KTH Heimdal Kerberos prior to version 0.5.1 and 0.4enb1
    KTH eBones Kerberos prior to version 1.2.1
    MIT Kerberos 4 all versions
    MIT Kerberos 5 up to and including krb5-1.2.6
    Other implementations derived from the vulnerable MIT or KTH code
    may also be vulnerable.

    Description:
    The kadmind daemon shipped with multiple versions of KTH and MIT
    Kerberos contains a buffer overflow that can allow remote attackers
    to gain root access. kadmind provides remote administrative access to
    the Kerberos authentication database, and runs on the Key Distribution
    Center (KDC) server of a Kerberos realm. The problem lies in the code
    that provides legacy version 4 compatibility.

    See also item 4 in the SANS CVA V1N14 dated 10/25.

    Risk: Remote compromise.
    Remote root compromise of Kerberos authentication servers running
    kadmind.

    Deployment: Moderate.

    Exploitation: Unknown.
    There have been no substantial details posted. However, MIT reports
    that the vulnerability is being actively exploited and it is assumed
    that exploit code is available.

    Status: Vendor confirmed, fixed software available.

    References:
    - ------------
    MIT Advisory:
    http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/advisories/MITKRB5-SA-2002-002-kadm4.txt

    Document Describing Potential Attack Signatures for MIT Kerberos:
    http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/advisories/2002-002-kadm4_attacksig.txt

    CERT Advisory CA-2002-29:
    http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-29.html

    Debian Security Advisory
    http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/linux/debian/2002-q4/0296.html

    NetBSD Security Advisory
    http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/netbsd/2002-q4/0083.html

    SuSE Security Advisory:
    http://www.suse.com/de/security/2002_034_heimdal.html

    Council Site Actions:
    Several of the reporting council sites have Kerberos V5
    implementations. They took action to verify that compatibility mode
    for V4 was not turned on. The remaining council sites reported that
    they are not running Kerberos.

    **********************************************************************

    About the CVA Process and Council
    =================================
    The CVA is produced in four phases:

    Phase 1: Neohapsis (www.neohapsis.com) director of research, Jeff
    Forristal and the Neohapsis team scour all of the major vendor web
    sites as well as bugtraq and other sources of new vulnerability
    information and compile what they believe to be a complete list of
    all new vulnerabilities and major vulnerability announcements made
    during the week. The SANS Institute and Network Computing Magazine vet
    the list through the major system manufacturers and jointly publish
    it every week as the Security Alert Consensus. (SAC) Anyone may
    subscribe to the SAC at http://www.sans.org/newlook/digests/

    Phase 2: TippingPoint's Vicki Irwin culls the SAC list to extract the
    vulnerabilities and announcements that demand immediate action. This
    reduces the list from 30-50 each week down under 10. Vicki has been
    on the front lines of intrusion detection and vulnerability testing
    for nearly five years and her work in the field is legendary.

    Phase 3: Very technical security managers at fifteen of the largest
    user organizations in the United States each review the "immediate
    action" vulnerabilities and describe what they did or did not do
    to protect their organizations. Council members include banks and
    other financial organizations, government agencies, universities,
    major research laboratories, ISPs, health care, manufacturers,
    insurance companies and a couple more. The individual members have
    direct responsibility for security for their systems and networks. All
    were concerned that information about their security configuration
    would leak out, and agreed to serve only if their identities were
    not revealed.

    Phase 4: SANS compiles the responses and identifies the items on which
    the Council members took or are taking action, produces the weekly CVA,
    and distributes it via email to all eligible persons

    **********************************************************************
    Critical Vulnerability Analysis Scale Ratings

    CRITICAL: Vulnerabilities are rated CRITICAL if the impact of
    exploiting the vulnerability can disrupt critical or large segments of
    a network (e.g. Internet facing services) or if the impact involves
    a remote exploit that provides root access to the host. Typically,
    for CRITICAL vulnerabilities, the vulnerability is easy or trivial to
    exploit and/or exploit code is available. Critical vulnerabilities
    usually involve server systems and/or high-value assets. Remediation
    for alerts of this nature should begin within 48 hours, and in some
    cases, immediately depending on the widespread use of the technology
    within your organization.

    HIGH: Vulnerabilities are rated HIGH if the impact of exploiting the
    vulnerability is not as severe as CRITICAL alerts and the affected
    software/platforms are generally not critical services within the
    organization. A HIGH vulnerability may be something that effects
    the client side (user hosts) and not a services such as Mail, DNS,
    Web ,etc. Typically, there is a higher degree of difficulty in
    exploiting HIGH vulnerabilities. Exploit code may not be available
    or the attacker must entice the victim (e.g. visit a server or run an
    attachment) to exploit the code. Remediation for alerts of this nature
    should begin within five business days. If there is widespread use of
    the technology at your organization or critical hosts are involved,
    the remediation effort should begin sooner.

    MODERATE: Vulnerabilities are rated MODERATE if the probable impact
    of exploiting the vulnerability is considered low due to the limited
    severity of the vulnerability, or there is a very high degree of
    difficulty in exploiting the vulnerability, and an exploit is not
    available in the wild. Moderate vulnerabilities may require the
    attacker to have some type of user privileges or entice the victim in
    order to exploit the problem. Remediation for alerts of this nature
    should begin within 15 business days. If there is widespread use of
    this technology at your organization or you run the affected software
    on critical hosts, the remediation efforts should begin sooner.

    **********************************************************************
    Subscriptions: The CVA is distributed free of charge to chief
    information security officers and technical security managers of
    organizations with at least 1000 systems, to GIAC certified security
    professionals, and to recent alumni of SANS courses. Eligible
    recipients may forward this report to other employees of their
    organizations, but not to people outside their organizations.

    Visit http://www.sans.org/newlook/digests for subscription information.

    To change your subscription, address, or other information, visit
    http://www.sans.org/sansurl and enter your SD number (from the
    headers.) You will receive your personal URL via email

    Copyright 2002. No copying or forwarding allowed except by registered
    subscribers.
                             ==end==

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQE9xnUv+LUG5KFpTkYRAjUtAJ4oX6RU/UiT93AH3a7B36DXRyS/EgCgkBRz
    kpCY6jSk0JEFC0sFSyTc2s8=
    =FAvF
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----