|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: False Sense of Security?
From: Devdas Bhagat (devdas
WORLDGATEIN.NET)Date: Thu Nov 16 2000 - 10:38:44 CST
- Next message: Henry Luciano: "Re: False Sense of Security?"
- Previous message: Talisker: "Re: Etrust Intrusion Detection = SessionWall 3.0"
- In reply to: Jacob Martinson: "False Sense of Security?"
- Next in thread: Henry Luciano: "Re: False Sense of Security?"
- Reply: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: False Sense of Security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Jacob Martinson spewed into the ether:
> but not necessarily as cost-effective as other things. This really
> only applies to detecting exploit attempts I think. I can definitely
> see the value in discovering active use of backdoors and otherwise
> suspicious traffic with a nids or some kind of protocol analyzer.
That is the real purpose of a NIDS. Detecting exploits is a secondary
effect of watching these occurences. :)
<Newbie here, if I am wrong, an enlightening mail will be better than a
flame>
Devdas Bhagat
-- "Arguments with furniture are rarely productive." -- Kehlog Albran, "The Profit"
- Next message: Henry Luciano: "Re: False Sense of Security?"
- Previous message: Talisker: "Re: Etrust Intrusion Detection = SessionWall 3.0"
- In reply to: Jacob Martinson: "False Sense of Security?"
- Next in thread: Henry Luciano: "Re: False Sense of Security?"
- Reply: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: False Sense of Security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]