|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: NIDS == Bad!
From: Sean McHugh (Sean.McHugh
EPIC.SUNGARD.COM)Date: Tue Dec 12 2000 - 11:08:18 CST
- Next message: Rainer Duffner: "Re: NIDS == Bad!"
- Previous message: John Marrett: "Re: NIDS == Bad! (fwd)"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin Roesch: "NIDS == Bad!"
- Next in thread: Adams, Gavin: "Re: NIDS == Bad!"
- Maybe reply: Sean McHugh: "Re: NIDS == Bad!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> if i'm not mistaken, i think marcus wrote the intro to their
>> book. Being an info world columnist is tough - you have to
>> make a big splash once a week.
>That reason alone is why no one with a clue should take any of >the
contents of most of these industry magazines to heart.
<humor>
which reason ? that marcus wrote their introduction, or that
there is a need for a breakthrough every week ?
</humor>
while i agree with your assessment about sending out the
wrong message i also think that bombastic comments among colleagues gets the
blood flowing. that is a sec-auditors
job - to a hit a nerve every now and then.
sean
- Next message: Rainer Duffner: "Re: NIDS == Bad!"
- Previous message: John Marrett: "Re: NIDS == Bad! (fwd)"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin Roesch: "NIDS == Bad!"
- Next in thread: Adams, Gavin: "Re: NIDS == Bad!"
- Maybe reply: Sean McHugh: "Re: NIDS == Bad!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]