OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Martin Roesch (roeschMD.PRESTIGE.NET)
Date: Fri Apr 06 2001 - 14:55:02 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Torgeir Hansen wrote:
    >
    > I've done some testing with snort and found out that it doesen't tell me that
    > it drop's ANY packet's when run on linux (slackware,PIII800Mhz with 512Mb ram
    > and a IDE-drive),
    > however when i do the same test on the same hardware, but with OpenBSD - it
    > tell's me that it drop's around 80-84% packet's..

    Linux doesn't keep dropped packet stats in versions prior to 2.4...

    > These tests where done on 100Mbit/s switched lan, using this snort rule at the
    > end of all the original rules:
    > alert tcp any any -> any any (msg: "IDS01 - DoS-data";)

    That's why you're dropping so many packets, you're logging almost all of
    your TCP traffic to the hard drive!

        -Marty

    > Abe Getchell wrote:
    >
    > > I've tested Snort (Linux version on Red Hat 7.0) on a T3, almost
    > > fully utilized at 43MBit/sec, on a single processor PIII 800 w/ 512MB of
    > > memory. The box's processor was hammered, about 98% utilization, but it
    > > only utilized about 120MB of memory. It didn't drop any packets. Just make
    > > sure you have a good NIC. That probably the most important consideration.
    > > If you're going to sniff tagged traffic, make sure you have a card which
    > > supports 802.1q.
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > > Abe
    > >
    > > Abe L. Getchell - Security Engineer
    > > Division of System Support Services
    > > Kentucky Department of Education
    > > Voice 502-564-2020x225
    > > E-mail agetchelkde.state.ky.us
    > > Web http://www.kde.state.ky.us/
    > >
    > > > -----Original Message-----
    > > > From: Pedro Ortale Neto [mailto:ortaleUNSECURITY.COM.BR]
    > > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:20 PM
    > > > To: FOCUS-IDSSECURITYFOCUS.COM
    > > > Subject: Re: Snort - Sensor and Analyst console HW config
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Hi,
    > > >
    > > > Well.. I use snort in a T1 enviroment and it's work fine. Snort is a
    > > > 'lightweight' IDS, so a pentium 2 machine with 64 MB of RAM
    > > > and a good disk
    > > > space is enought ;)
    > > >
    > > > rgds,
    > > >
    > > > Pedro Ortale Neto
    > > >
    > > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > > From: "Subba Rao" <subba9home.com>
    > > > To: <FOCUS-IDSSECURITYFOCUS.COM>
    > > > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 2:44 PM
    > > > Subject: Snort - Sensor and Analyst console HW config
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > > Hello,
    > > > >
    > > > > I am planning to deploy a Snort IDS for a client of mine.
    > > > The Internet
    > > > > connection is at 256K to their ISP. What kind of processor
    > > > and memory
    > > > would be
    > > > > recommended for a sensor with 4 NICs monitoring about 3
    > > > DMZs? There will
    > > > be
    > > > > only one analysis system. What kind of processor and memory
    > > > is required on
    > > > this
    > > > > system?
    > > > >
    > > > > Hopefully someone here has configured HW for Snort in
    > > > production. If there
    > > > is
    > > > > anything I have to watchout for, please let me know.
    > > > >
    > > > > Thank you in advance for any input.
    > > > > --
    > > > >
    > > > > Subba Rao
    > > > > subba9home.com
    > > > > http://members.home.net/subba9/
    > > > >
    > > >