|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: dcdave (dcdave
att.net)Date: Tue Jul 10 2001 - 14:15:49 CDT
As an ISS senior pro-serv top-gun for a couple of years, and a certified ISS
trainer, I got a lot of experience with RS and it's development paths, etc.
There are solutions for most problems - the heavy traffic situation usually
just requires more processing power to handle. The developers are actively
working to keep the design scalable to the future (with more or less
success).
I am looking for a strategy which incorporates some Black Ice technology to
start appearing in future versions of RS.
I know RS is capable of doing more things than most people know about, thus
the training recommendation. I also know the development team is committed
to the marketplace, which is good (in picking a product with longer
life-cycle) and bad (try to get a sensor running on an obscurix station, or
a console on anyix).
If you want specific info, please feel free to let me know off-line.
dcdave
Dave Druitt
Senior Security Engineer
Director, Latin Americas
Info Sec Group
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Maiwald" <emaiwald
fred.net>
To: <tracylowe
inzen.com>
Cc: <focus-ids
securityfocus.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: RealSecure
> On 10 Jul 2001 tracylowe
inzen.com wrote:
> > My company is considering purchasing ISS's
> > RealSecure v6.0.
> >
> > Does anyone have firsthand information about this
> > product?
> >
> > I am interested in knowing the pro's and con's of the
> > product's overall performance as well as how
> > effectively it handles heavy traffic.
>
> My company is an ISS partner and we resell, install, and we
> also manage it for our clients. I have been playing with 6.0
> for some time now. Hopefully, this is what you are looking
> for.
>
> Overall the GUI, reporting and configuration of the system is
> very easy (just follow the instructions as the sequence is important).
>
> Out of the box, the system has a number of attack signatures that
> are useful. It also has a number of signatures that are not very
> useful (syn flood comes to mind). It is important to take the time
> to understand what the system can do and what it can tell you.
>
> Aside from the existing signatures, you also have the capability
> to define your own connection events, filters, and events. All of
> these events can be sent to the console and to email for notification.
>
> If you have more detailed or specific questions, feel free to ask.
>
> Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Eric Maiwald, CISSP emaiwald
fred.net
> Chief Technology Officer 301-977-6966
> Fortrex Technologies, Inc. Gaithersburg, MD
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]