|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: robert.d.turner
bt.comDate: Fri Dec 21 2001 - 03:31:31 CST
Hi
WRT a one-way cable, this was posted on the list in July:
Sam Ng wrote:
> Take a look at this:
>
> http://personal.ie.cuhk.edu.hk/~msng0/sniffing_cable/index.htm
>
> Sam Ng
A colleague has built one, and it does work....
Robert
-- Robert Turner GCIA Security Solutions Designer & AnalystIgnite Solutions - Secure Business Services T: +44 (0)113 244 5951 F: +44 (0)113 244 5657 Robert.D.Turner
bt.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: Clement-Evans, Rhys [mailto:Rhys.Clement-Evans
swisslife.co.uk] > Sent: 20 December 2001 10:18 > Cc: focus-ids
securityfocus.com > Subject: RE: Use of Taps for IDS > > > When I was investigating securing my IDS system by use of taps, I considered > making a read-only cable for the simplest solution (well ok, the simplest > solution would have been to not bind any protocols to the IDS interface). > > Investigation showed that there was the potential for the intermediate > hub/switch to deactivate the port used, as the relevant 'incoming' wires > would be disconnected. I suspect that this is more something to be aware of > with the higher end hubs and switches, but can anyone advise whether this is > a real concern or just clever marketing on the part of tap manufacturers? > > Regards, > > Rhys
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]