OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: vokeycaciworldwide.com
Date: Thu Jan 10 2002 - 10:41:27 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hi Mike, it sure is possible, but I would suggest using iptables on your
    gateway box
    to block portscans and filter traffic. Attached is a copy of a generic
    iptables script
    to help you out. Remember that a firewall is only as good as the
    operating system
    you run it on, so, if you use linux, make sure it's patched and running
    the latest kernel
    (which can be found at www.kernel.org), also turn off all the unwanted
    services such as rsh,
    rexec, lockd, portmap, telnet, identd, inetd, lpd, etc. by running
    chkconfig.

    Actualy, for an operating system / firewall / IDS, I would use FreeBSD
    with ipfw and snort. With
    a previous company all my linux servers on our DMZ where hacked, but none
    of the FreeBSD systems
    where touched. Just a thought.

    Good Luck.

    Cory Vokey
    Systems Administrator
    ACI/MessagingDirect
    www.messagingdirect.com
    www.aciworldwide.com

    "Mike Hrubes" <MHrubeswizmo.com>
    01/09/2002 10:29 AM

     
            To: <FOCUS-IDSSECURITYFOCUS.COM>
            cc:
            Subject: Newbie IDS questions

    Hi all,

    I'm new to the IDS world. I understand what an IDS does, and why you
    need it, but I have some questions on the technical aspect of IDS. We
    are planning on implementing an IDS in the near future. The idea that
    has been proposed is to put the IDS in the path between connections,
    rather than connected in promiscuous mode. The reason they want to do
    this is so they can also run a blocking software, like portsentry, to
    block unwanted scans, etc.

    Is this even possible to do? The idea is to use a linux server running
    snort. This box would have two interfaces to route the traffic through
    it, scanning the signatures at the same time.

    Possible/not possible? If possible, good idea/bad idea? Opinions in
    general?

    Thanks in advance,

    Mike Hrubes