OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Frederick M Avolio (fred_at_avolio.com)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 08:15:13 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    >Outside Government and Military circles where I can see Common Criteria
    >Certification being extremely useful, how valuable is it, ie within the
    >financial sector etc ? More importantly what are it's failings?

    CAVEAT: My direct knowledge of the CC is about 2 years old. Maybe things
    are better. I doubt it.

    The Common Criteria has all the markings of what it is: a government
    created and organized, committee deliberated, process. (That's meant to be
    really negative, for those who like such things, and exclaimed, "Cool!")
    Notice the definition on their web page: "The Common Criteria represents
    the outcome of a series of efforts to develop criteria for evaluation of IT
    security that are broadly useful within the international community."

    The "warning signs" are "series of efforts" and "broadly useful." (And it
    is over 600 pages.) The CC is a standard for measurement. But there is no
    "Firewall test," not "IDS test," etc. As long as you understand that it is
    a set of specific criteria in standard format against which a vendor can
    document any product, there is no problem.

    Example: If we had such a thing for automobiles, you'd be able to lay a
    chart for every one next to the other and compare across for the things you
    cared about. They would all use standard notation for the same features.

    Wait... that sounds really useful. Yes, except -- using the example I just
    gave -- you have to create the tables and you have to know the code name
    for each feature. Oh, and the manufacturer gets to decide what features to
    highlight and what to leave out. There is no requirement to include and
    specific criterion. It is *not* a Consumer Reports (sorry, I realize some
    of you don't know what I mean) evaluation of products with identical
    selection criteria reporting how each product fared.

    Is Common Criteria useful? I don't see how it is.

    Fred
    Avolio Consulting, Inc.
    16228 Frederick Road, PO Box 609, Lisbon, MD 21765, US
    +1 410-309-6910 (voice) +1 410-309-6911 (fax)
    http://www.avolio.com/