|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Named Chroot Environment
From: Sotiris Tsimbonis (stsimb
FORTHNET.GR)Date: Mon Jul 10 2000 - 11:46:38 CDT
- Next message: Faber Fedor: "Q not found in the archives..."
- Previous message: Don Head: "Re: Mandrake postfix and netconf question"
- In reply to: John McMillan: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Next in thread: John McMillan: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Next in thread: Joe Laffey: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Reply: Sotiris Tsimbonis: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Reply: John McMillan: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, John McMillan wrote:
> >1) I am interested in using the chroot enviro but will the new named make it's syslog()
> >entries in to the real /var/log/messages vs. the chrooted /var ?
> It will if you put a socket called 'log' in the chrooted '/dev', then add
> ' -a /path/to/chroot/dev/log' to your syslog line. The way I prefer
> to do it however, is to use holelogd, which will listen to your
> chrooted /dev/log and pass that to syslog, similar to what klogd
> does.
Is there any particular reason that you prefer holelogd, even if your
syslog supports -a ?
_ _ _|_ o._ o _
_)(_) |_ || |_>
- Next message: Faber Fedor: "Q not found in the archives..."
- Previous message: Don Head: "Re: Mandrake postfix and netconf question"
- In reply to: John McMillan: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Next in thread: John McMillan: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Next in thread: Joe Laffey: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Reply: Sotiris Tsimbonis: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Reply: John McMillan: "Re: Named Chroot Environment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]