|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: firewalls on single boxes ?
From: J C Lawrence (claw
KANGA.NU)Date: Sat Oct 28 2000 - 19:43:10 CDT
- Next message: Marco Shaw: "Re: SV: For security disable everything that you don't need."
- Previous message: Blake R. Swopes: "Re: firewalls on single boxes ?"
- Next in thread: William Cordis: "Re: firewalls on single boxes ?"
- Maybe reply: J C Lawrence: "Re: firewalls on single boxes ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000 08:42:41 -0700
John Sage <jsage
FINCHHAVEN.COM> wrote:
> I'm running my firewall on a Pentium 150 with 48mb RAM; it's also
> running a caching-only name server, PortSentry (see:
> http://www.psionic.com/abacus/portsentry/ ) and LogCheck (see:
> http://www.psionic.com/abacus/logcheck/ ) Apache (internally), and
> some other stuff and it's not even breaking a sweat. It's *not*
> running X, however ;-)
An i386-33 with 8Meg RAM is actually overpowered for most home Linux
firewall duties (given that you are not running a proxy-style
firewall ala TiSGate).
-- J C Lawrence Home: clawkanga.nu ---------(*) Other: coder
kanga.nu http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Keys etc: finger claw
kanga.nu --=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--
- Next message: Marco Shaw: "Re: SV: For security disable everything that you don't need."
- Previous message: Blake R. Swopes: "Re: firewalls on single boxes ?"
- Next in thread: William Cordis: "Re: firewalls on single boxes ?"
- Maybe reply: J C Lawrence: "Re: firewalls on single boxes ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]