|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Regarding *.pwl files...
From: Gene Gomez (ggomez
VERANCE.COM)Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 11:24:30 CDT
- Next message: Bill Phu: "Re: NT domain renaming"
- Previous message: Anders, David: "Re: Winodws 95 login box"
- In reply to: Ray Marron: "Re: Winodws 95 login box"
- Next in thread: Damian Gerow: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Next in thread: Ray Marron: "Re: Winodws 95 login box"
- Reply: Gene Gomez: "Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Damian Gerow: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Ray Marron: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Sean Duffy: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Free, Bob: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Larma, Mark: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Steven Frey: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Forrester, Mike: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Free, Bob: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Colleen Tibbs: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Fleck, Michael: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Damian Gerow: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: sigipp
WELLA.COM.BR: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Harmer, Mike: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Winodws 95 login boxHey all,
Regarding the mentioned *.pwl files, does anyone know of a crack that exists
to exploit *.pwl files in order to gain access to the domain passwords for
the users of a Win9x machine? I'd expect that something like l0phtcrack
exists to attack those.
My concern is that my Windows 2000 machines and their authentication
mechanisms are safe (the BIOS specifies boot from C: drive, then has setup
password protection...a local attacker would have to crack open the casing
to get past the OS), but Windows 9x has ALWAYS made me nervous. My company
is very security-conscious, so if I could demonstrate to them that we need
to migrate the remaining Windows 98 users to Windows 2000, that would be a
great boon to both my network and personal feeling of security.
Thanks!
-Gene
-----Original Message-----
From: Focus on Microsoft Mailing List
[mailto:FOCUS-MS
SECURITYFOCUS.COM]On Behalf Of Ray Marron
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 3:04 PM
To: FOCUS-MS
SECURITYFOCUS.COM
Subject: Re: Winodws 95 login box
Correction: In my earlier reply to this thread, I mentioned *.pwd files
in the Windows directory. That should be *.pwl files, and the filename will
be the name of the associated user. Sorry!
Ray Marron
Network Administrator
Mitchell Sweet & Associates
raym
msamail.com
http://www.msasolutions.com
- Next message: Bill Phu: "Re: NT domain renaming"
- Previous message: Anders, David: "Re: Winodws 95 login box"
- In reply to: Ray Marron: "Re: Winodws 95 login box"
- Next in thread: Damian Gerow: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Next in thread: Ray Marron: "Re: Winodws 95 login box"
- Reply: Gene Gomez: "Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Damian Gerow: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Ray Marron: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Sean Duffy: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Free, Bob: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Larma, Mark: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Steven Frey: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Forrester, Mike: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Free, Bob: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Colleen Tibbs: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Fleck, Michael: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Damian Gerow: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: sigipp
WELLA.COM.BR: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Reply: Harmer, Mike: "Re: Regarding *.pwl files..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]