OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Peter Meister (petermeiMICROSOFT.COM)
Date: Tue Mar 06 2001 - 09:55:06 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Again,

    The Technet article articulates that sharing components are disengaged, but
    as i said earlier.. You must have multi-mode inplace inorder to access
    Remote Admin more than one time. I have a system i just tested your method
    of Notepad.exe running on a system set to remote admin. After launching the
    Notepad.exe for Admin1 user his process ID for Notepad.exe is (2600) then
    engaged Admin2 user on the same remote admin terminal server and launched
    Notepad.exe and his process ID was (2704).

    This clearly shows and you can test if need be that when a user whether in
    Remote Admin or App Mode executes a .exe file when logged in they are
    executing it in there own Process ID and Kernal Space. This is Multi-mode
    execution....If we do not do this then every concurrent user in Remote Admin
    would collide with each others Process ID's and either corrupt the session
    app or in essense crash the Kernal. Even if Administrator user comes in to
    the same box on seperate RDP channels the Administrator account is running
    in multi-mode. Try it, i would also love to see how you accomplish your East
    / West notepad.exe share as ive tried on multiple Remote Admin machines and
    its impossible to reproduce this...

    Please test this if you like, so there is no confusion the article in
    TECHNET is not explaining itself in full completeness.
    Chapter 16 only indicates that the mode set in App mode is different then
    that of App Mode, this is correct...but the Remote mode and App mode must
    have application executable seperation in order to produce stable mult-admin
    connections....I hope this helps you, i hope this clarifies and answers your
    question. Please try my test and the results should make clear that the apps
    are seperated in there own Kernal Space with Seperate Process ID's for each
    app the user fronts whether in App Mode or Remote Admin mode.

    Thanks,

    Peter Meister
    Terminal Server SME
    Microsoft Corporation

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:larobinsbellatlantic.net]
    Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:44 AM
    To: Peter Meister; FOCUS-MSSECURITYFOCUS.COM
    Subject: Re: Win2K Terminal Service as Web Server Admin Tool

    Below...

    > Laura is 80 % correct...Remote Admin limits but its Mult-user
    capable...And
    > to clarify Windows XP does not change this or do it any different then W2K
    > did. You can't execute Word.exe 2 times and not be in Mult-mode ....thus
    in
    > essense Multi-user is default when Terminal Server is deployed, either in
    > Remote Admin or App mode. The limitations are by deployment design, not
    > multi mode execution..
    >
    > -Peter
    > Terminal Server SME - Microsoft
    >
    Will the Resource Kit and online documentation be updated to change
    information such as what I've copied and pasted below?

    From:
    http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/win2000/dguide/chapt-16.asp#a

    "Remote Administration mode only installs the remote access components of
    Terminal Services. It does not install application sharing components. This
    means you can use Remote Administration with very little overhead on mission
    critical servers. Terminal Services allows a maximum of two concurrent
    Remote Administration connections. No additional licensing is required for
    those connections, and you do not need a license server. "

    Additionally, when I connect twice to a terminal server licensed in remote
    admin mode, I share a single session and am actually able to interact with
    that session from either machine. In fact, a friend and I once used this to
    test his terminal server. He was on the West coast, I was on the East coast,
    and we used notepad in the session to communicate with one another.

    I'm not trying to challenge the information you've provided; I'm just
    attempting to clarify whether or not I am misunderstanding you.

    Thanks,

    Laura