OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: McCammon, Keith (Keith.McCammonEADVANCEMED.COM)
Date: Fri Apr 27 2001 - 13:49:33 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    This is actually a great idea. I've set this up for a client in the past
    who wanted added measures in place in the event of a defacement. We set up
    a staging server with firewalls on both sides, and set up a scheduled job to
    run at set intervals. When the job ran, it would stop the w3svc, causing
    the content verification on the load balancing server to fail (so public
    requests would be re-routed). Then it would purge the web root and reload
    from the staging server via an FTP script. W3svc would restart, and off it
    went...

    The staging server would do the same thing at greater intervals from an
    internal data store. Pretty solid!

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Bragg Michael (npl1mcb) [mailto:npl1mcbUPS.COM]
    Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 4:16 PM
    To: FOCUS-MSSECURITYFOCUS.COM
    Subject: Re: Installing hotfixes

    Matt,

    ACK. However, one suggestion which I have heard tossed about is to have
    your webserver in the DMZ/"barrier reef" update its data at some preset
    interval (e.g., every hour or two hours) from a server inside the firewall.
    Set the firewall for one-way (internal -> external) data transfer, and even
    if some kidiot does deface the page, you're back to previous configuration
    in a few hours anyway. Perhaps a bit inefficient in terms of data
    duplication, but hey, a little redundancy is a good thing, right?

    Any suggestions/comments/flames/death threats you good folks have are
    welcome and encouraged...

    bg
    Michael Bragg
    United Parcel Service
    Technology Support Group
    http://www.ups.com