OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Marco Teelen - Systemec BV - (mteelensystemec.nl)
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 05:48:18 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Another alternative which seems to be very good is WS_FTP server 2. You can
    configure it as a service and it is able to use the userlist from your winnt
    or win2k server, has ODBC integration and SSL option.

    http://www.ipswitch.com/Products/WS_FTP-Server/index.html

    the only drawback maybe is the price of $395.

    Greetings,

    Marco Teelen

    ----- Original Message -----
    > Hello group,
    >
    > I am interested to hear some opinions from people regarding alternatives
    to
    > installing IIS on WIN NT 4 systems requiring occassional FTP access.
    >
    > Basically what I want to enable is the ability to collect some application
    > log files (once a month is enough) from a group of NT machines.
    >
    > At present IIS 4 has been installed on each of these machines, with an FTP
    > root limited to a range of internal (non-routable) IP addresses, no
    > anonymous access and ACL'd to suit.
    >
    > >From a user point of view, all that I need is that when someone tries to
    FTP
    > to the machine, they recieve an FTP login prompt, authenticate with an NT
    > domain userid and password, and are able to go about thier business.
    >
    > What are my options to get an FTP service running, without the overhead of
    > installing and running the entire option pack?
    >
    > Can anyone recommend an alternative or two for me to research, especially
    > freeware / shareware and especially somewhat compact in build?
    >
    > Or am I opening a whole new can of worms security wise by not using IIS. I
    > get the impression that IIS *** properly configured *** offers a
    reasonable
    > level of security under NT (I can hear the groans from here from some
    > quarters!) so perhaps some people have a comment or two on this aspect of
    > the issue.
    >
    > thanks!
    > Adrian Beauchamp
    >