OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Uidam, T (Tim) (Tim.UidamSYD.RABOBANK.COM)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 21:23:22 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    A point worth noting before deciding on any FTP daemon is whether or not
    your decided package will run as an NT service, rather than requiring a user
    to be logged on to start the FTP Server.... in my experience, not very many
    will do this out of the box...

    just my 2c.

    Tim.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Guillermo Dewey [mailto:rootmetro.com.mx]
    Sent: Saturday, 19 May 2001 9:19
    To: FOCUS-MSSECURITYFOCUS.COM
    Subject: RE: alternatives to IIS for FTP server on WIN NT 4

    Hi

    the new serv-u 3.0 server from http://www.Serv-U.com/ its in my opinion the
    best ftp server.. I have tested all the comercial ftp servers. including
    ws_pro

    Other versions of serv-u ' s where not reliable or for heavy use but this
    one just released some days ago is :)

    regards

    ****************************************************************************
    *************
    * Visit our new Cold Fusion Product
    * IMS Option Pack 2.4 based on the most powerful email server
    * http://srv1.metro.com.mx/ims.cfm
    *
    * Guillermo Dewey Guerra
    * Metro Solutions S.A. de C.V.
    * gdeweymetro.com.mx
    * ICQ: 25876549 (GDewey)
    *
     
    ****************************************************************************
    *************

    At 09:14 a.m. 18/05/01 -0400, you wrote:
    >If you have an NT4 system, WS_FTP Server works quite well and can use a
    >variety of databases, including your NT account database. Also includes
    SSL
    >support for end-to-end session encryption when using WS_FTP Pro client. I
    >think the whole package is less than $600.
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Adrian Beauchamp [mailto:adrianbeauchampcs.com]
    >Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:21 AM
    >To: Focus on Microsoft Mailing List
    >Subject: alternatives to IIS for FTP server on WIN NT 4
    >
    >
    >Hello group,
    >
    >I am interested to hear some opinions from people regarding alternatives to
    >installing IIS on WIN NT 4 systems requiring occassional FTP access.
    >
    >Basically what I want to enable is the ability to collect some application
    >log files (once a month is enough) from a group of NT machines.
    >
    >At present IIS 4 has been installed on each of these machines, with an FTP
    >root limited to a range of internal (non-routable) IP addresses, no
    >anonymous access and ACL'd to suit.
    >
    > From a user point of view, all that I need is that when someone tries to
    FTP
    >to the machine, they recieve an FTP login prompt, authenticate with an NT
    >domain userid and password, and are able to go about thier business.
    >
    >What are my options to get an FTP service running, without the overhead of
    >installing and running the entire option pack?
    >
    >Can anyone recommend an alternative or two for me to research, especially
    >freeware / shareware and especially somewhat compact in build?
    >
    >Or am I opening a whole new can of worms security wise by not using IIS. I
    >get the impression that IIS *** properly configured *** offers a reasonable
    >level of security under NT (I can hear the groans from here from some
    >quarters!) so perhaps some people have a comment or two on this aspect of
    >the issue.
    >
    >thanks!
    >Adrian Beauchamp

    ==================================================================
    De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
    is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
    onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
    de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
    ==================================================================
    The information contained in this message may be confidential
    and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
    receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
    herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.

    ==================================================================