See: http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0103.html under
"Harvard's "Uncrackable" Crypto"

I think it's maybe what you're talking about? To quote Bruce Schneier, "the
popular press does not count as peer review"

--- "Jonathan M. Slivko" <jonathan.slivkolotuscom.net> wrote:
> What about the new encryption scheme that was in the papers? It supposedly
> deletes the encryption key as it's being created, supposedly thats totally
> unhackable. Comments?
> -- Jonathan
>
> At 04:32 PM 6/18/2001 -0400, Ken Pfeil wrote:
> >And given enough time, CPU cycles, and physical access, nearly ANY
> >encryption scheme can be broken. The point is to make it more difficult (not
> >impossible) to recover information when using EFS. You will never reach that
> >point of computing nirvana that will guarantee security of information. I
> >must be missing the point of your posting David. Is there some type of
> >vulnerability here or are we theorizing hypothetical situations?

=====
: __o
: -\<,
: 0/ 0

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]