|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: John Wienand (JWienand
bna.com)Date: Fri Jul 06 2001 - 08:53:30 CDT
My understanding of the difference is that 'Users' is a
group you would have to add a user to (default when creating
a new user in W2K). So only those who you have specifically
added to that group (or allowed to remain a member) would
have the rights and permission's of that group.
'Authenticated Users' includes anyone who has been
Authenticated on the Server. So if someone logs in to the
server (non-anonymous connection) they would have the rights
and permission's assigned to this group by default.
John
"Loschiavo,
Dave" To: "'focus-ms
securityfocus.com '" <focus-ms
securityfocus.com>
<DLoschiavo
frcc cc:
.cc.ca.us> Subject: Users -vs- Authentciated Users
07/05/2001 06:30
PM
Can someone please explain the functional differences
between the built-in
groups "Users" and "Authenticated Users" in Windows 2000?
I'd like to
understand what practical differance there is in assigning a
right or
permission to the group "Users" instead of the group
"Authenticated Users",
and vice versa. I'd also gladly accept a URL to a site that
explains the
same.
I'm looking over security guidelines published by the NSA
and DISA, and the
NSA is using Users, while DISA is using Authenticated Users.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]