OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Vladimir Shtern (vladisavicatech.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 13:57:40 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hi fellows on list,
    Please see mail posted on BUGTRAQ list.
    I am personally feel confused.
    Seeking opinion.
    -vs
    >To: "Russ" <Russ.CooperRC.ON.CA>
    >Cc: "BUGTRAQ" <BUGTRAQsecurityfocus.com>
    >Subject: NT Users SHOULD be CAREFULL when applying NT hotfixes "Multiple
    >version problem inside NT Hotfixes"
    >
    >+--------------------------------------------.
    >Multiple version problem inside NT Hotfixes .
    >+----------------------------------------------`--------------------+
    >Hotfixes Affected: MS00-057 MS00-078 MS00-090 .
    >Type : Wrong Version .
    >Date : 3-10-2001 .
    >Product : Microsoft NT Server and workstation .
    >Author: : NtWaK0 www.versalys.com .
    >+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
    >
    >-----------------------------.
    >NT Hotfixes Version Problem .
    >-------------------------------`------------------------------------.
    >MS00-078: Web Server Folder Traversal Vulnerability
    >MS00-057: File Permission Canonicalization Vulnerability
    >MS00-090: .ASX Buffer Overrun and .WMS Script
    >-------------------.
    >Problem Introduction.
    >---------------------`----------------------------------------------.
    >MS00-078: Web Server Folder Traversal Vulnerability
    >Microsoft Internet Information Server 4.0
    >Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0
    >
    >Description of vulnerability can be found at
    >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS00-078.asp
    >
    >Patch can be found at
    >http://download.microsoft.com/download/winntsp/Patch/q269862/NT4ALPHA
    >/EN-US/prmcan4i.exe
    >
    >MS00-057: File Permission Canonicalization Vulnerability
    >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms00-057.asp
    >
    >Patch can be found at
    >http://download.microsoft.com/download/winntsp/Patch/q269862/NT4ALPHA
    >/EN-US/prmcan4i.exe
    >
    >
    >As you can see based on Microsoft description you should also run the
    >MS00-057, both both fixes are goes together if you want.
    >That what make both hotfixes affected by the problem.
    >
    >------------------------------------.
    >Problem detail MS00-078 prmcan4i.exe .
    >--------------------------------------`-----------------------------.
    >The problem is in the files version included in these hotfixes.
    >The hotfix prmcan4i.exe supposed to fix or change these files:
    >asp.dll
    >sspifilt.dll
    >ssinc.dll
    >w3svc.dll
    >
    >Now if we take a look at the file version one by one and compare that
    >to the file contained in the hotfix MS00-060, this hotfixes supposed
    >to be older then MS00-078 and the files inside supposed to be newer
    >then the file contained in MS00-057 and MS00-060
    >
    >Files inside the prmcan4i.exe MS00-078 :
    >---------------------------------------
    >HF\NT\prmcan4i>filever asp.dll sspifilt.dll ssinc.dll
    >--a-- W32i DLL ENU 4.2.749.1 shp 330,080 08-03-2000 asp.dll
    >--a-- W32i DLL ENU 4.2.749.1 shp 25,360 08-03-2000 sspifilt.dll
    >--a-- W32i DLL ENU 4.2.749.1 shp 38,256 08-03-2000 ssinc.dll
    >--a-- W32i APP ENU 4.2.749.1 shp 228,496 08-03-2000 w3svc.dll
    >
    >Now let us compare these file with the file contained in the hotfix
    >
    >MS00-060 MS00-060: IIS Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities
    >Description of vulnerability can be found at
    >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS00-060.asp
    >
    >Files inside the crsscri.exe MS00-060 :
    >--------------------------------------
    >--a-- W32i DLL ENU 4.2.752.1 shp 330,080 10-03-2000 asp.dll
    >--a-- W32i DLL ENU 4.2.752.1 shp 25,360 10-03-2000 sspifilt.dll
    >--a-- W32i DLL ENU 4.2.752.1 shp 38,256 10-03-2000 ssinc.dll
    >--a-- W32i APP ENU 4.2.752.1 shp 229,008 10-03-2000 w3svc.dll
    >
    >AS you can see 4.2.752.1 is > 4.2.749.1 this may lead to a security
    >problem. Since the newwer hotfix it contain older dll's.
    >Second users who are thinking that MS00-078 is newer then MS00-060
    >they maybe wrong.
    >
    >-----------------------.
    >Second Problem MS00-090 .
    >-------------------------`------------------------------------------.
    >MS00-090: .ASX Buffer Overrun and .WMS Script
    >
    >I did found a problem with this hotfix "wmqfe33955.exe".
    >The file dxmasf.dll in the hotfix (wmqfe33955.exe) is version
    >6.4.9.1110 but the file on the system is version 6.4.9.1109 and when
    >you run this hotfix it wont update the file, GO figure.
    >
    >I have tried this on 3 different NT boxes and still it did not update
    >the file. I did not get any error while applying the hotfix.
    >Leaving an older file, this will leave your system open to the
    >exploit mentioned on MS00-090.
    >Description of vulnerability can be found at
    >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet
    >/security/bulletin/ms00-090.asp
    >
    >
    >NOTE: Microsoft consider this a technical issue, I do not agree. Since this
    >affect the hotfixes and the hotfixes job is to fix from security problem
    >most of the time.
    >
    >
    >
    >________________________________________________________________________
    >The only secure computer is one that's unplugged, locked in a safe,
    >and buried 20 feet under the ground in a secret location... and i'm
    >not even too sure about that one"--Dennis Huges, FBI.
    >____________________________________________________________.___________
    >Live Well Do Good |
    >Je Pense, Donc Je Suis \(|)/
    >I know I ain't perfect, but i'm 99 point 9 percent :) --(")--
    >RFCs are meant to be read and followed…:) /`\ NtWaK0
    >________________________________________________________________________