OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Schwartz, Stanley (sschwartzstlo.smhs.com)
Date: Tue Apr 16 2002 - 06:43:36 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hello again!

    Apparently, we are forgetting what initiated my first response. It was
    someone stating that (basically) all security starts and ends with the
    admin. I disagree with that statement. I think it starts with properly
    coded OS (whether its Microsoft or not), and it should end with the admin.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Arendt, Jordan ED0 [mailto:Jordan.Arendtsasked.gov.sk.ca]
    Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:34 PM
    To: 'Schwartz, Stanley'; 'focus-mssecurityfocus.com'
    Subject: RE: Users slam Microsoft Security Analyser

    Stanley,

    This is an invalid argument as it applies to all NOS's.
    As to why MS should release the patches? Because some of us do subscribe to
    the MS security list, and this list, and NTbugtraq, and we do apply the
    patches.

    Microsoft has the same responsibility that all other software vendors have.
    When someone reports a bug, they investigate it, create a patch, (test it :)
    ), and notify the public at large.

    Yes, MS coded the bug into their OS/APP. And, yes it's possible a hacker
    could be exploiting it before a patch is released. This is so for all
    Apps/OS's. So, don't use any of them.

    Jordan

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Schwartz, Stanley [mailto:sschwartzstlo.smhs.com]
    Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:11 PM
    To: 'Marc Fossi'; 'focus-mssecurityfocus.com'
    Subject: RE: Users slam Microsoft Security Analyser

    Again, before you reported it on Dec 7th, our systems were still vulnerable,
    we just didn't know it yet.

    I agree that a good admin will use all his/her resources to defend their
    systems. However, if it's up to admin's to fix or workaround all the
    vulnerabilities in Windows, why should Microsoft bother releasing hotfixes?
    Does Microsoft have any responsibility here?

    The point is that Microsoft coded Windows with this vulnerability (and
    others, some of which we don't know of yet) in it, and saying that good
    admin(s) can defend against attacks isn't necessarily always true.

    Stan :)

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Marc Fossi [mailto:mfossisecurityfocus.com]
    Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:50 PM
    To: Schwartz, Stanley
    Cc: Focus-MS
    Subject: RE: Users slam Microsoft Security Analyser

    On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Schwartz, Stanley wrote:

    <snip>
    > Example (read as content): Did you know your Active Directory domain
    > was susceptible to that Group Policy vulnerability before the alert
    > came out (which was listed on one of the pages I referenced)?
    > Ignorance IS bliss....ain't it?
    <snip>

    http://online.securityfocus.com/bid/4438

    This was a known issue for a while before MS patched it. It was reported by
    3APA3A to Bugtraq on Dec. 7, 2001
    (http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/244329).

    The key here is not just to wait for MS to tell you that something is
    broken, but to monitor lists like Bugtraq for new vulnerability
    announcements. There are some vulnerabilities that were announced on
    Bugtraq months ago that MS still has not addressed. The good thing is that
    usually a lot of people from the community will make suggestions for
    workarounds for these issues until MS gets around to patching it.

    As a responsible admin, the onus is on you to make use of all the available
    resources.

    Cheers,

    Marc Fossi, MCSE
    SecurityFocus
    www.securityfocus.com