|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Keith Smith (ksmith_at_firesnacks.com)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 09:53:02 CST
I have a similar question, though in application to Outlook 2002 clients
accessing an exchange server across the Internet. Microsoft claims that with
OL2002, clients don't need to employ a VPN across the internet, as the RPC
is all encrypted.
Would a VPN also be recommended in this instance given the observations
below?
Thanks
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Harrison (SPG) [mailto:jmharr
microsoft.com]
Sent: Sunday January 12, 2003 9:43 PM
To: Valentine M. Smith; focus-ms
securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: AD replication over WAN
Given that the replication path (port/protocol) is well-defined and
generally understood, it also makes sense that they could also provide a
"door" to your AD controllers for those who wish to do you harm for no
apparent reason.
With that in mind, it seems clear to me that a site-to-site VPN is not only
preferable, it's mandatory.
* Jim Harrison <mailto:jmharr
microsoft.com>
MCP(NT4/2K), A+, Network+
Security Business Unit (ISA)
________________________________
From: Valentine M. Smith [mailto:vmsmith
grokking.org]
Sent: Thu 1/9/2003 06:21
To: focus-ms
securityfocus.com
Subject: AD replication over WAN
Hi,
I'm looking for some feedback from the community regarding the transfer of
AD
traffic over a public WAN.
The basic plan is this:
Single Win 2000 domain spread over two sites in different cities. Each site
has perimeter NAT device and are obscuring internal subnets with IP
addresses
provided by a single ISP. No internetwork VPN planned. DNS is AD-integrated
at both sites. Both DCs are patched to SP3.
The MS documentation I've consulted indicates that AD replication, and by
extension, DNS zone information that is AD-integrated is automatically
encrypted.
My question: if the data is already encrypted and is passing only across a
single ISP's network, should one be bothering with a router-router VPN
tunnel
for this traffic? IOW, would setting up such a tunnel for this data be
redundant/unnecessary or am I missing something important here? Would anyone
care to comment on the relative safety of AD encryption out-of-the-box?
Thanks in advance for any feedback,
VS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]