OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Chris Weiscopf (chris_at_bamcom.net)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 11:05:53 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    At the very least you can deploy a site to site VPN using Windows 2000
    Routing and Remote Access Service. Open you LAN routers to pass the VPN
    traffic, set up the site-to-site VPN in RRAS and set a static route in your
    router pointing back to the server to reach the remote network. VPN
    benefits with no additional hardware costs.

    Chris Weiscopf
    MCSE 2000, CCNA, Network+, A+
    Uni-Point, LLC

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Valentine M. Smith [mailto:vmsmithgrokking.org]
    Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:21 AM
    To: focus-mssecurityfocus.com
    Subject: AD replication over WAN

    Hi,

    I'm looking for some feedback from the community regarding the transfer of
    AD
    traffic over a public WAN.

    The basic plan is this:

    Single Win 2000 domain spread over two sites in different cities. Each site
    has perimeter NAT device and are obscuring internal subnets with IP
    addresses
    provided by a single ISP. No internetwork VPN planned. DNS is AD-integrated
    at both sites. Both DCs are patched to SP3.

    The MS documentation I've consulted indicates that AD replication, and by
    extension, DNS zone information that is AD-integrated is automatically
    encrypted.

    My question: if the data is already encrypted and is passing only across a
    single ISP's network, should one be bothering with a router-router VPN
    tunnel
    for this traffic? IOW, would setting up such a tunnel for this data be
    redundant/unnecessary or am I missing something important here? Would anyone

    care to comment on the relative safety of AD encryption out-of-the-box?

    Thanks in advance for any feedback,

    VS