OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Aidan O'Kelly (okellyXNET.IE)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 07:58:01 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    I found the best way is to look around for programs that dont have their
    rights properly set, for example, the admin just copied an exe while as a
    user, and occasionly runs it as administrator, write a small exe that checks
    what user called it, if it was an admin then do whatever u want to it and
    call the original(now renamed and put somewhere else). and otherwise just
    run the program as normal. Now, having said that, I've only tried it on NT 4
    Win2k might be better at setting the rights and not letting IUSR_<mach>
    overwrite files. But there could well be some exe lying around with write
    permissions for everyone.

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Penetration Testers [mailto:PEN-TESTSECURITYFOCUS.COM]On Behalf
    > Of Paul Cardon
    > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 11:09 PM
    > To: PEN-TESTSECURITYFOCUS.COM
    > Subject: Re: [PEN-TEST] Expand right under Win2K
    >
    >
    > Matthew Pemble wrote:
    > >
    > > Tamas wrote:
    > >
    > > >Does anyone knows any password brute forcer that works without
    > > >accessing the SAM file?
    > > >
    > > >We are still eager to hear further ideas on this issue
    > since nothing
    > > >that we tried worked yet.
    > >
    > > If you can't get the SAM, can you run a packet sniffer on the target
    > > machine? If so, grab the NTLM authentication hashes and L0phtcrack
    > > can process them. Much, much slower than SAM cracking, though.
    > >
    > > You ought to be able to run a program within the IUSR context, your
    > > ability to install will depend on the individual sniffer.
    >
    > Repeat after me everybody:
    >
    > "I am on a Win2K box using the IUSR_<blah> account gained
    > via the IIS
    > Unicode vulnerability. I do not have Administrator privileges. I can
    > only get to what a non-privileged user can access which is why the SAM
    > repair file is not readable."
    >
    > It's getting frustrating that people aren't paying attention or don't
    > understand the scenario that was originally introduced, but hey, I'm
    > still smiling. :^)
    >
    > Now, I honestly don't know of a sniffer that can be installed without
    > Administrator privilege. If you can install a sniffer without those
    > privs it seems like you could do plenty of other nasty stuff on that
    > server.
    >
    > local.exe and global.exe from the resource kit can be used along with
    > dumpsec.exe to determine which user accounts on the server or
    > domain are
    > in Administrator groups and will help you find the
    > Administrator account
    > even if it has been renamed.
    >
    > Somebody already mentioned SMBgrind for brute force login attempts. A
    > similar tool (NetBIOS Auditing Tool) can be found at:
    >
    > http://www.nmrc.org/files/snt/nat10.tar.gz
    >
    > and doesn't require you to have a copy of CyberCOP around.
    >
    > Keep in mind that it will only be effective if the admin
    > hasn't bothered
    > to restrict the number of failed login attempts.
    >
    > -paul
    >