From: rajat swarup (rajatsgmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 08 2007 - 01:14:38 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 8/8/07, Nikhil Wagholikar <visitnikhilgmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. However as I said earlier that "if suppose SMTP is
> configured on port 26 instead of traditional port 25, then it would
> add a twist to this situation". Hence your suggested method would
> still leave some hosts down. Can you kindly further granularize your
> suggestion?

But it would turn up with port 25 as "closed" which still shows that
the host is alive.

--
Rajat Swarup

http://rajatswarup.blogspot.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!

http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]